<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Girls of Dragon Age: Origins &#8211; Why This Shit Matters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.righteousorbs.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.righteousorbs.com/?p=967</link>
	<description>In My Sissy Robe &#38; I Deathard</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 11:04:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jkaen</title>
		<link>http://www.righteousorbs.com/?p=967&#038;cpage=1#comment-5465</link>
		<dc:creator>Jkaen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.righteousorbs.com/?p=967#comment-5465</guid>
		<description>Ok, I admit part of my rant is misaimed, I had forgotten the original post was about the advertisement of the game, not how they are actually portrayed in the game itself.

New argument then, I think the advertisement is geared towards the readership of the specific magazine in question, with emphasis and spin to suit. I would argue should the readership of &quot;femainist weekly&quot; be large enough to target with advertisement then the game is deep enough to produce a suitable advertisement / article that would suit that readship.

That doesn&#039;t get round the viscous circle of women not gaming (in general) as games are not targeted at them, and games not being targeted at them because they don&#039;t game. This I think can only be overcome by evolution rather than revolution

You touch on this on the 3rd paragraph, but then that out of the way proceed to rip into them</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I admit part of my rant is misaimed, I had forgotten the original post was about the advertisement of the game, not how they are actually portrayed in the game itself.</p>
<p>New argument then, I think the advertisement is geared towards the readership of the specific magazine in question, with emphasis and spin to suit. I would argue should the readership of &#8220;femainist weekly&#8221; be large enough to target with advertisement then the game is deep enough to produce a suitable advertisement / article that would suit that readship.</p>
<p>That doesn&#8217;t get round the viscous circle of women not gaming (in general) as games are not targeted at them, and games not being targeted at them because they don&#8217;t game. This I think can only be overcome by evolution rather than revolution</p>
<p>You touch on this on the 3rd paragraph, but then that out of the way proceed to rip into them</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chastity</title>
		<link>http://www.righteousorbs.com/?p=967&#038;cpage=1#comment-5451</link>
		<dc:creator>Chastity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.righteousorbs.com/?p=967#comment-5451</guid>
		<description>I fail to see why one needs to play a game in order to judge the *way it is advertised*. By that logic you could never complain about an advertisement unless you actually bought the product.

I&#039;m also not sure how &quot;plain jane&quot; describes any of the female NPCs in Dragon Age. Paticularly since most of them are *very specifically* modeled on ... well ... professional models.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fail to see why one needs to play a game in order to judge the *way it is advertised*. By that logic you could never complain about an advertisement unless you actually bought the product.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also not sure how &#8220;plain jane&#8221; describes any of the female NPCs in Dragon Age. Paticularly since most of them are *very specifically* modeled on &#8230; well &#8230; professional models.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jkaen</title>
		<link>http://www.righteousorbs.com/?p=967&#038;cpage=1#comment-5450</link>
		<dc:creator>Jkaen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.righteousorbs.com/?p=967#comment-5450</guid>
		<description>With regards what different gender characters &#039;get&#039; as romance options in that game its actually:

Male - latin male, ginger, stringtop
Female - latin male, ginger, weightlifting hulk.

So they are giving diverse options that include homosexual options, as well as &#039;straight&#039; options.

If I had to classify the women, I would say they have gone for &#039;plain jane&#039;, &#039;mother&#039; and &#039;sex object&#039; as broad steriotypes, which given just 3 choices is I believe a reasonable spread.

Its also for example the first game that I can remember that has a mentally handicapped character as a fairly major character you interact with, and its not done for cheap laughs either.

I think each has a background and story that is reasonable, and while I do like this blog (can&#039;t play WoW right now due to poor quality connection in the country I currently work in) I still read this blog as I find it funny and entertaining, I would suggest you actually play the game, or at least talk to those who have before judging it further.

Oh if it matters at all regarding my comments, I am male.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With regards what different gender characters &#8216;get&#8217; as romance options in that game its actually:</p>
<p>Male &#8211; latin male, ginger, stringtop<br />
Female &#8211; latin male, ginger, weightlifting hulk.</p>
<p>So they are giving diverse options that include homosexual options, as well as &#8217;straight&#8217; options.</p>
<p>If I had to classify the women, I would say they have gone for &#8216;plain jane&#8217;, &#8216;mother&#8217; and &#8217;sex object&#8217; as broad steriotypes, which given just 3 choices is I believe a reasonable spread.</p>
<p>Its also for example the first game that I can remember that has a mentally handicapped character as a fairly major character you interact with, and its not done for cheap laughs either.</p>
<p>I think each has a background and story that is reasonable, and while I do like this blog (can&#8217;t play WoW right now due to poor quality connection in the country I currently work in) I still read this blog as I find it funny and entertaining, I would suggest you actually play the game, or at least talk to those who have before judging it further.</p>
<p>Oh if it matters at all regarding my comments, I am male.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chastity</title>
		<link>http://www.righteousorbs.com/?p=967&#038;cpage=1#comment-5305</link>
		<dc:creator>Chastity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.righteousorbs.com/?p=967#comment-5305</guid>
		<description>Oh and (4) &quot;sex appeal&quot; when it consists *exclusively* of images of hot women in order to appeal to heterosexual men is *by definition* sexist. At least if you&#039;re talking about a product which is supposedly marketed at men and women equally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and (4) &#8220;sex appeal&#8221; when it consists *exclusively* of images of hot women in order to appeal to heterosexual men is *by definition* sexist. At least if you&#8217;re talking about a product which is supposedly marketed at men and women equally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chastity</title>
		<link>http://www.righteousorbs.com/?p=967&#038;cpage=1#comment-5304</link>
		<dc:creator>Chastity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.righteousorbs.com/?p=967#comment-5304</guid>
		<description>Several points

1) Contrary to what Joss Whedon might want you to believe, lesbianism is not implicitly empowering. Lesbian options in CRPGs aren&#039;t there to appeal to gay women, they&#039;re there to appeal to straight men.

2) The men don&#039;t look like they&#039;re models. Not at all. Yes neither of them are fat or ugly, but the warriors in the group actually look like they could lift a sword. Unless you count Zhevran, who looks like a *fetish* model and is quite explicitly teh ghey.

3) It&#039;s not a question of whether there are hot women in the game, it&#039;s a question of why the game was advertised in Maxim with a spread specifically devoted to looking at the hot babes, but curiously there was no parallel article in any women&#039;s magazine. And before you say &quot;that&#039;s the fault of the magazine&quot; yes, yes it is. It&#039;s all part of the same problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several points</p>
<p>1) Contrary to what Joss Whedon might want you to believe, lesbianism is not implicitly empowering. Lesbian options in CRPGs aren&#8217;t there to appeal to gay women, they&#8217;re there to appeal to straight men.</p>
<p>2) The men don&#8217;t look like they&#8217;re models. Not at all. Yes neither of them are fat or ugly, but the warriors in the group actually look like they could lift a sword. Unless you count Zhevran, who looks like a *fetish* model and is quite explicitly teh ghey.</p>
<p>3) It&#8217;s not a question of whether there are hot women in the game, it&#8217;s a question of why the game was advertised in Maxim with a spread specifically devoted to looking at the hot babes, but curiously there was no parallel article in any women&#8217;s magazine. And before you say &#8220;that&#8217;s the fault of the magazine&#8221; yes, yes it is. It&#8217;s all part of the same problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ra</title>
		<link>http://www.righteousorbs.com/?p=967&#038;cpage=1#comment-5282</link>
		<dc:creator>Ra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.righteousorbs.com/?p=967#comment-5282</guid>
		<description>Duh, well, by now the game is out and it is clear that some of these are lesbians (woman at the top - btw one of the males is also gay) and that the males also all look like they&#039;re models. 

Sexism? No. Sexual appeal? Yes.

(PS, the males show more skin if you take their clothes off - their boobs are also completely exposed. The horror 11!!1)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duh, well, by now the game is out and it is clear that some of these are lesbians (woman at the top &#8211; btw one of the males is also gay) and that the males also all look like they&#8217;re models. </p>
<p>Sexism? No. Sexual appeal? Yes.</p>
<p>(PS, the males show more skin if you take their clothes off &#8211; their boobs are also completely exposed. The horror 11!!1)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Syrana</title>
		<link>http://www.righteousorbs.com/?p=967&#038;cpage=1#comment-5245</link>
		<dc:creator>Syrana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 02:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.righteousorbs.com/?p=967#comment-5245</guid>
		<description>@Chastity 

1 - I never called feminists bad or evil.

2 - Not cool to bash another blogger in your comments and put words in their mouth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chastity </p>
<p>1 &#8211; I never called feminists bad or evil.</p>
<p>2 &#8211; Not cool to bash another blogger in your comments and put words in their mouth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chastity</title>
		<link>http://www.righteousorbs.com/?p=967&#038;cpage=1#comment-5071</link>
		<dc:creator>Chastity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 15:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.righteousorbs.com/?p=967#comment-5071</guid>
		<description>Yeah, the &quot;mature&quot; &quot;dark&quot; ads were also really annoying (seriously, what the *fuck* was the deal with the Marilyn Manson).

Sadly I don&#039;t think it&#039;s an attempt to appeal to the &quot;mainstream&quot;. The sad fact is that most gamers really do believe that &quot;tits and blood&quot; is the same thing as &quot;maturity&quot;.

And of course, there&#039;s an extent to which a genuinely &quot;mature&quot; game would be really dull:

&quot;It was a time of great darkness and terrible wonder, a time when heroes stood up and resolved their disputes peacefully without resorting to unnecessary violence&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, the &#8220;mature&#8221; &#8220;dark&#8221; ads were also really annoying (seriously, what the *fuck* was the deal with the Marilyn Manson).</p>
<p>Sadly I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s an attempt to appeal to the &#8220;mainstream&#8221;. The sad fact is that most gamers really do believe that &#8220;tits and blood&#8221; is the same thing as &#8220;maturity&#8221;.</p>
<p>And of course, there&#8217;s an extent to which a genuinely &#8220;mature&#8221; game would be really dull:</p>
<p>&#8220;It was a time of great darkness and terrible wonder, a time when heroes stood up and resolved their disputes peacefully without resorting to unnecessary violence&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feralan</title>
		<link>http://www.righteousorbs.com/?p=967&#038;cpage=1#comment-5070</link>
		<dc:creator>Feralan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 15:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.righteousorbs.com/?p=967#comment-5070</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been a Bioware fan since the days of Baldur&#039;s Gate 1, and I&#039;m really looking forward to Dragon Age, but this does piss me off like most of their mainstream marketing for that game does. It&#039;s being harped as &quot;mature&quot; and &quot;dark&quot;. Well, contrary to popular opinion, sex and gore are neither &quot;mature&quot; nor &quot;dark&quot;. If anything I&#039;d call an overload of such features &quot;pubescent&quot; more than anything. And the screeching Manson music in some trailers, the ridiculous amounts of gore, and the way Morrigan (the dark-haired one) who is the so-called face of the game is dressed and paraded about like a whore ...

... yeah. &quot;Mature&quot;.

It&#039;s been speculated that the marketing campaign is an attempt to reach a more &quot;mainstream&quot; audience since CRPGs are somewhat of a fringe thing. The argument is: &quot;Well, the old CRPG and Bioware fans will (likely) buy Dragon Age anyway, so why not try luring in men who don&#039;t normally go for this sort of game but like hot bitches and bloodshed?&quot; But the marketing has annoyed a good deal of the old fans, I think, and the new target audience may be put off despite the copious gore and naked tits when they see Dragon Age is a tactical squad-based game with pause and play, not a twitchy clickfest for bunnyhoppers.

And yeah, ugh. Scrawny female characters are always near the top of my annoyance list, I like my melee types (as PCs and NPCs) and I want them to LOOK the part. I generally don&#039;t give a crap about &quot;pretty&quot;, I want &quot;competent&quot; and &quot;fitting her story and role&quot;. (Likewise, men who look like they&#039;ve been fed nothing but steroids since conception are equally stupid. Hello, Wow!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been a Bioware fan since the days of Baldur&#8217;s Gate 1, and I&#8217;m really looking forward to Dragon Age, but this does piss me off like most of their mainstream marketing for that game does. It&#8217;s being harped as &#8220;mature&#8221; and &#8220;dark&#8221;. Well, contrary to popular opinion, sex and gore are neither &#8220;mature&#8221; nor &#8220;dark&#8221;. If anything I&#8217;d call an overload of such features &#8220;pubescent&#8221; more than anything. And the screeching Manson music in some trailers, the ridiculous amounts of gore, and the way Morrigan (the dark-haired one) who is the so-called face of the game is dressed and paraded about like a whore &#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230; yeah. &#8220;Mature&#8221;.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s been speculated that the marketing campaign is an attempt to reach a more &#8220;mainstream&#8221; audience since CRPGs are somewhat of a fringe thing. The argument is: &#8220;Well, the old CRPG and Bioware fans will (likely) buy Dragon Age anyway, so why not try luring in men who don&#8217;t normally go for this sort of game but like hot bitches and bloodshed?&#8221; But the marketing has annoyed a good deal of the old fans, I think, and the new target audience may be put off despite the copious gore and naked tits when they see Dragon Age is a tactical squad-based game with pause and play, not a twitchy clickfest for bunnyhoppers.</p>
<p>And yeah, ugh. Scrawny female characters are always near the top of my annoyance list, I like my melee types (as PCs and NPCs) and I want them to LOOK the part. I generally don&#8217;t give a crap about &#8220;pretty&#8221;, I want &#8220;competent&#8221; and &#8220;fitting her story and role&#8221;. (Likewise, men who look like they&#8217;ve been fed nothing but steroids since conception are equally stupid. Hello, Wow!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nugget</title>
		<link>http://www.righteousorbs.com/?p=967&#038;cpage=1#comment-5031</link>
		<dc:creator>nugget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 02:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.righteousorbs.com/?p=967#comment-5031</guid>
		<description>Doh critted by comment system - meant to make the comment about attractive male representations via graphics in Asian games here instead of over thaar where it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doh critted by comment system &#8211; meant to make the comment about attractive male representations via graphics in Asian games here instead of over thaar where it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
